Cowleaze
Introduction
Shepton Beauchamp Cowleaze Meadow Project
This project is a community effort to utilize a 1 hectare (approx) site near the centre of the village. The site has been leased by the owners, Wessex Water, to the Parish council for 25 years. The site currently contains a sewage pumping station, which pumps waste water, and surface water to the treatment works in South Petherton. It has been formerly used as a sewage treatment works, but this was decommissioned in 1986.
It is hoped to provide a woodland/shrubby area, orchard area, wild flower meadow, secure seating and pathways that will allow access to a majority of the site by wheelchair users, parents with children in buggies, and all other villagers. It is also intended that a portion of the site is used by the playgroup as an allotment to grow vegetables, and to set up a sensory garden. Cowleaze Meadow can be found on OS maps using ref ST40561708. It contains a public right of way, and is bordered by a stream. The surrounding land is used for grazing cattle, growing arable crops, commercial fruit/vegetable production, housing and productive gardens with mature fruit trees. Various surveys have shown no remarkable plant species. There is a colony of water voles in the stream, and badgers, rabbits, deer, foxes have all been seen in the area. An otter has recently been observed in an adjacent field.
Local volunteers, who come from all parts of the community, will carry out the body of the work, once the basic infrastructure has been provided. We have secured the money for the work to be completed by contractors from a Community Spaces Lottery funded grant. The local school will use the area for nature walks, and the play group will be doing some planting. Before work can commence we require further soil samples to be analysed to make sure the areas to be planted with edible crops is free from any contamination. The survey and soil samples have been completed, and we are waiting for the results.
In addition to grant applications, we have received money from the parish council, various donations from groups and individuals.
Mary H Clarke 22nd February 2010

Click here to see a larger version of the latest planned layout
Wildlife Watch
Would you like to take part in our Wildlife Watch, we have prepared a few notes which will help you plus a form on which you can record your findings, click to download then print your own copies.
Wildlife Data Collection Form
For details of all the wonderful wildlife recorded to date see the Flora and Fauna page.
News - Views - Events
Notes on Meeting 16 April 2009
At 2.30 pm Roger, David and Mary met with Barbara Collier, Tree Planting Project Officer with South Somerset District Council, on site to discuss the types of trees to be planted in various locations, and to advise on distances between individual specimens.
We agreed that, as shown in the plan, the woodland area would contain standard trees planted approximately 9metres apart. There would have to have a weeded area at base, and be mulched to prevent weed growth in the initial stages of growth. We would aim for this to be an open woodland with no under planting of shrubs.
In the area designated “possible school use” we would plant mixed shrubs and trees, to aim for fairly dense growth that would be suitable for a “wild” play area for children. This thicket would have no tall trees immediately near the power cables which pass across this corner of the site. Before any work is done on this aspect of the site, the spiked railings would need to be removed/made safe, and all half buried remnants removed.
Barbara estimates that we would need approximately 400 whips to cover this area. The orchard area will contain standard trees, and be spaced at intervals of 9metres. Varieties of cider apples and some desert apples with local significance will be used.
Barbara has provided us with a guide to areas of Somerset, and the suitability of various species for those soil types, which we will use in making our final selections.
Information on local apple varieties will be posted to us, plus a model risk assessment form, which might be of use.
We would like to thank Barbara for help in our project, and look forward to having it planted up.
At 7.30 the group met in the pub. Marcus, Debbie, David, Roger and Mary were present.
We reported on Barbara Collier’s visit. Roger informed us that he had received official notification that we had been awarded the Development Grant for our Stage 2 application for funding from the Lottery. This £1500 will allow us to carry out site survey work, and enable us to progress the rest of our application.
Roger is in negotiation with a local Landscape Architect, who will be able to work with us, and eventually, sign off the project when all works have been satisfactorily completed. He is having an onsite consultation to agree terms etc.
We are unable to apply for grass cutting and maintenance equipment in this application, so will have to find other sources of funds.
Roger has been in contact with Wessex Water, and they have made a site visit to examine a tap found near the pumping station. This had been installed about 40 years ago, and would have been necessary for the workers in the old sewage works. We should be able to use the water, but will have to modify the present system, and provide a new standpipe, trench, cover for tap etc.
Various aspects of the details of which tasks we would undertake, and those we would need contractors for, were discussed.
To make the seating area accessible to children, we will need to get rid of nettles and brambles on that area. Mark Doughty has previously indicated that Wessex Water would be happy for us to spray some areas. It would be best to do spraying when weeds are growing vigorously, so we need to get moving. Mary to contact Wessex Water, and the Environment Agency.
Contract work to be done re fencing, paths, gates, seating were discussed. The next working party is on Sunday 26th April, from 10am onwards. The removal of railings is to be completed asap.
Another working party is on Sunday 17th May, from 10am onwards, unless changed.
Next meeting to be arranged when developments with survey etc have made progress.
Mary H Clarke 17th April 2009
Notes on Meeting 12th May 2009
Notes on meeting, with Martin Fine, attended by Roger and Mary.
As Martin had been unable to contact Geoff Weber at the end of last week, he gave him a call, but was unable to make contact. He will try first thing tomorrow morning, when Geoff should be in his office. We hope he will get:
- Details of two nominated people whose contact details we will have, who will deal with the survey.
- For them to have contact details of Andy Roberts, and for them to liaise with him.
- A clear timetable of what is to be done, and by who, and when.
- A clear understanding that we need this done rapidly, before the end of May if possible.
We are very anxious to make progress on this matter, as its outcome is crucial for the completion of the Stage 2 application, which was supposed to be submitted within a year of successfully completing the Stage 1 application (August 2008).
Mary to contact Andy Roberts to see if he can help to alleviate the logjam, and he is the man with the technical knowledge to assess what is required. Joy Williams, biodiversity officer for Somerset county Council is to be contacted to see if there are any guidelines about biodiversity that we should be considering when Hyder carries out this survey.
Ideally she would contact Hyder to discuss their plans. We also need guidance about best practice when it comes to implementing our plan.
On 5th May 2009 Groundworks UK have acknowledged that small community groups such as ours do not always have the skills to complete the application forms in the required format to satisfy the bureaucrats, and have allowed facilitators to make a final draft ready for submission in the correct form.
This should ensure that the application has a better chance of success! We are to get all available supplementary information (that will form the appendices of the Stage 2 application) ready by our next meeting, and have filled in the draft application as far as we can.
Roger’s photos of the site are extremely good, and provide a good overall view, taken last October. Again we need the information from Hyder to enable us to complete, as this is a key piece of work.
Groudworks have now stipulated that we MUST have a project leader who is a landscape architect, and that on completion of the project we will need a certificate of completion. A competent person who is independent of the delivery team and project leader must sign this. The name of the person proposed must be entered on the Stage 2 application form. Roger to explore whether some one in the County Council would be able to carry out this task. (Barbara Collier may be able to guide us here)
In spite of all this expert input, we still need our Advisory Panel for any additional consultation.
We will need to get 3 quotes for all tasks to be paid for, including the Project Leader. Martin emphasised that we need competent people, and that they understand that any charges agreed may be subject to changes due to survey results. All quotes to include VAT. We can get a quote for initial advice before Stage 2 application is completed, and then a separate one for supervision and completion of project in a lump sum. We would expect a letter of intent to include a fixed fee for a specific time. Confirmation of acceptance of the quote will come from the funder.
In a recession there may be more flexibility. The project leader must be someone we can happily work with, and who will also work well with the person signing off the completed project.
Martin has agreed to contact Pete Lever of David Wilson Partnership re advice about getting a suitable landscape architect.
A draft risk assessment document has been completed using one supplied by Barbara Collier as a guide. One of the risks not really considered so far is that of Wessex Water vehicles accessing site in an emergency, when there may be children around. We need to find out what protocols exist with regard to access to a site that will be open to the public at all times.
Should a notice be erected to worn approaching drivers of the possibility of people on the site, and also one to warn those using the site of the possibility of traffic in the area? Mary to contact Ellen McDouall about this matter, and find out who to contact re Health and Safety in Wessex Water.
Do we need prior information about vehicle movements, and do we need to inform the Police, Fire dept, etc of these possible events? Roger to check the lease re service agreements.
Next meeting to take place on Tues 16th June at 10.30.
Mary H Clarke 12th May 2009
Notes on Meeting 1st September 2009
Notes on meeting held on Tues 1st September 2009, attended by Debbie, Roger, David, Marcus and Mary.
The meeting discussed the informal findings of the soil sampling carried out on 10th August 2009. These were that a sample taken from the proposed orchard area contained unexpected evidence of arsenic and cadmium, and an area close to the proposed seating area had slightly raised levels of Benzo(a)pyrene, which is often found near tarmac and scalping. (This area has been used for parking vehicles, and turning vehicles.)
In general, the problems can be avoided by altering the proposed growing position of various plants on the meadow, to avoid growing anything that could be eaten on areas that may have raised levels of potentially toxic chemicals. It would be wise to carry out more detailed soil sampling in these area when funds become available. We have informed the ecologist at Wessex Water to see what their response is, and hope for more information shortly.
At a recent visit to the village by David Laws, Roger raised the issue of lack of clarity about the “set aside” area next to the pumping station. Wessex Water have confirmed that the original designated area is broadly that initially discussed by the original team and Mark Doughty. In the unlikely event of Wessex Water needing to use that area, we would need to pay half the cost of removing any material we had placed there. As this is some fencing, benches and other small pieces of equipment this should not be a problem.
Wessex Water have produced site safety guidelines, and notices warning drivers of pedestrians, and pedestrians of vehicles have been erected in prominent positions on the site.
Mary is to seek clarification of levels of chemical compounds in soil, and pass these on to Jeff Downing at SSDC. Wessex Water to be contacted on Friday if no response received. Meanwhile work on finalising the application form for a meeting with Martin fine on Monday is continuing.
The committee would like to thank Roger for all his recent hard work on site (weed killing and cutting back and mowing) and also setting up the details of the Landscape Specification sent out to 6 potential contractors, all of whom were given a site visit if required. These tenders are being submitted at present.
It was decided that we should have a regular work party each month, with detailed tasks to be undertaken advertised in advance. These work parties to take place on the 4th Sunday of each month, from 10.30 am to lunch time. The first will be on Sunday 27th September. The aim will be to clear areas where fencing is to be erected, and to burn all dried brambles etc. Subsequent work parties will be on 25th October, 22nd November, 27th December, in 2009.
For more information on how you can join in ring Roger on 241608, Debbie on 241756, David on 52238, Marcus on 240619, Mary on 240363.
Mary H Clarke 2/9/09
Notes on meeting Friday 7/11/2008
Attended by Roger, Marcus, Jules, Debbie, Mary, David.
- Application for Watermark grant (Wessex Water) received, and grant award will take place in approx 2 months. Application for O2 award also received, and result of application will occur in a few weeks time.
- Response from Colin Skellett, Chairman Wessex Water, to our letter asking for further assistance with site survey, received. This does not offer any financial assistance beyond the possibility of a Watermark grant, but does supply much useful information on the site history. This will enable us to refine our requirements for testing soil etc. We have had positive responses from Andy Roberts of SCC, and Jeff Downing of SSDC. Mary to write to Andy and Jeff with outline of possible ways forward. Martin Fine, our facilitator, emphasises that the “duty of care for public use of the site” is all important. Mary to reply to Wessex Water.
- The utilities that may have infrastructure on the site will need to be contacted, to ensure we do not compromise their activities in any way. Water and Sewage information already received from Wessex Water, as is info from Western Power. Debbie to provide copies of these for application file. Mary to contact BT for telephone lines etc, Transco for gas pipes, and British Pipeline Agency for oil pipelines.
- Joy Williams, biodiversity officer, SSDC, has contacted David with regard to our proposals. (She is a colleague of Phil Stone) David to keep her informed.
- Roger is to contact Groundwork to confirm that an application for infrastructure work will be compatible with additional grants etc from other sources. We do not want to find that there is rigid deadline for completion of the project that will be incompatable with the long term development of the site.
- We still have no idea who cut back grass on the site several weeks ago. Although this was useful to get a view of what is present, we do not wish anyone else to “have a go” without talking to the committee. Once things are planted etc, we wish to remain in control of what happens on the site.
- Tree planting work on Sunday 9th Nov 12md to 2pm. Phil Bartlett has 5-6 black poplar trees, approx 30 willow ( red, yellow and black stemmed) whips and 1 swamp cypress to plant. As we have not made final descisions on the plan, these are to be heeled in until they can be replanted in their final position.
- The request for the playgroup to have plots in the seating area was discussed. It was agreed that this could be accommodated in the present plan, with some modification. This is likely to involved the use of central beds. This can be discussed further at AGM.
- It was suggested that the plan to have the orchard area start just inside the gateway, would be better visually if there were to be a selection of low growing shrubs in the area near the notice board, and then orchard trees.
- In Somerset, orchard trees are traditionally planted at 6m intervals, and some people felt this would lead to a regimented feel. It was suggested that some gaps might be left in the planting, or else some trees could be removed in a few years time, as they may not all thrive. This has not really been resolved. It is also recommended that the area around the base of the trees is kept vegetation free for a couple of years, until they are established and will not suffer competition from weeds.
- Though it is considered essential to have hard paths in key areas for use of wheelchairs, buggies etc, grass paths through trees are thought to be more appropriate, providing reasonable access is available to all users. We need to establish the position of these paths by mowing, so that dog walkers etc are habituated to walking where they will not interfere with new planting.
- Jules suggests willow pods in some areas, which can be planted to allow willow play “houses” to grow up.
- The bramble thicket remaining near the South West corner of the seating area should be planted with relatively low growing trees- hazel suggested- to keep down brambles, and not interfere with power lines.
- We will not rule out grazing animals on site at some later date, but they create difficulties.
- Position of gateways to be decided— particularly a lockable gate to prevent access to machinery etc., but with a pedestrian gate to allow wheelchair access etc. (What would Wessex Water think of a lockable gate?)
- Outline of agenda for AGM discussed, and will be sent out at weekend.
Mary H Clarke, 09/11/08
Notes following meeting Wed 15/10/08
Attended by Mary, Roger, Debbie, Marcus. Mary reported that a letter had been sent to Wessex Water identifying possible risks attached to using a former sewage works site for developing a community garden, outlining possible hazards, and requesting financial assistance with costs of a precautionary survey. Copies of the letter have been sent to various local councillors, and the local MP, as well as Mark Doughty, the senior Ecology officer.
Our facilitator, Martin Fine has been making preliminary soundings of ways in which we could reduce the costs of a survey. This may enable us to get a sufficiently detailed survey carried out, that would allow our application to for the Stage 2 grant to proceed smoothly.
Debbie reported a meeting with Phil Stone from Somerset County Council, who will be able to fund some trees for a community orchard at approx £10 per tree, and also provide woodland trees and guidance for people involved in planting. He suggests that most of the paths through woodland areas should be mowed grassland, and that this would allow disabled access and buggies etc. Most members of the group were happy with this, but felt that hard pathways were important in the seating area, for year round access.
The playgroup are keen to participate with a couple of vegetable plots, and a sensory plot. They envisage having raised beds, but because of the risk of possible contamination at the site of the old sewage filter beds, they would prefer to have these beds in the seating area. This has the advantage of being nearer the playgroup premesis (the village hall), and enable contact between the children, and residents of Buttle Close who may use the seating area. Shelley, the Playgroup Leader felt this would be beneficial to all. This needs to be discussed at the next meeting.
Andy Roberts, SCC officer, stressed that the end use of the land would indicate what kind of investigation needed to be carried out. This is very important when it comes to growing vegetables, planting trees etc, as the depth to which land is disturbed is important. Raised beds obviously will reduced disturbance to land.
Mary H Clarke